FDA makes blunder during hiring of PR firm to improve image

October 2nd, 2008 by Jennifer Walker-Journey

Every company can use a good spin doctor from time to time, and it looks like the Food and Drug Administration () is no exception.

Last month I told you that California Rep. Harry Waxman, who serves as head of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, raised concerns that items outlined on the ’s 2007 priorities list appeared to prioritize industry desires over consumer protection.

This, just months after more than 80 American deaths were linked to tainted heparin that was made in Baxter International Inc.’s facility in . officials later acknowledged they had not inspected that facility and claimed they had insufficient staff and financial resources to regularly inspect overseas manufacturers.

Today, the Washington Post reported that the has hired a public relations company it improve its image. However, in yet another PR blunder, the story reports that the way it hired the company may also be raising eyebrows.

The story suggests that the may have violated government contracting rules by not holding a bidding competition for a $300,000 contract hiring a firm to create “a lasting positive public image for the agency.” Instead it made a deal with Alaska Newspapers Inc., (ANI) which is exempt from having to compete for federal work because it qualifies for special set-asides. ANI agreed to funnel all the work to the ’s agency of choice, Qorvis Communications. Apparently the ’s new PR head, Mildred Cooper, had connections to the firm and wanted to use it.

The cancelled its contract with ANI/Qorvis Communications after the Washington Post’s story ran. And while the claims it never meant to do anything questionable during the selection process, this latest blunder certainly hasn’t helped the organization’s public image.

  • Sal
    The same firm listed here also works for big Pharma and their trade association PhRMA
blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.