The complaints accuse Baxter and its supplier, Scientific Protein Laboratories LLC, of negligence, alleging Baxter’s heparin was unsafe for the intended use. The lawsuits seek money damages.

The nightmare began in late 2007, as reports of serious allergic reactions and deaths following use of Baxter’s heparin began mounting. By March 2008, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a major recall of heparin. At the time, Baxter supplied about 50 percent of heparin to the U.S. As Baxter began pulling its heparin, investigations into the source of the contaminant focused on Baxter International’s China plant. The culprit was identified as over-sulfated chondroitin sulfate, or OSCS, a man-made chemical that mimics heparin.

While Baxter was at fault for distributing the tainted heparin, critical eyes fell on the FDA for not properly inspecting foreign drug manufacturing plants. The agency admitted it was simply too understaffed to properly inspect most of the foreign food and drug manufacturing plants. The FDA soon after received funding to open overseas field offices, the first three of which were opened in China.

The stricter inspections hardly console the victims and families of victims who suffered or died from the contaminated blood thinner. The FDA reports that as many as 395 deaths and 785 reports of serious injury were associated with the contaminated heparin.

Source: Bloomberg

SOURCE: Heparin Recall › Baxter faces numerous lawsuits over tainted heparin scandal

It wasn’t until then that Martin learned the syringe he had used on his young son was part of a recalled batch that was found to have been contaminated at the manufacturing plant AM2PAT. The tainted syringes killed five people and sickened at least 100 more before the Angier plant was closed. The company’s “clean room” was found to be a frightful mess.

Last month, two AM2PAT managers pleaded guilty to federal fraud and a warrant is out for AM2PAT president Dushyant Patel, who is still at large.

Knowledge of the recall did little to put Martin’s mind at ease. He wants answers from the company, the distributor of the syringes, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

“I just felt, why? Why didn’t somebody stop this?” he told media. “Not only did they hand me a loaded gun, they enabled me to pull the trigger on my own son.”

An FDA warning letter to the plant in 2005 reported no major safety violations. However, an FDA spokesperson says in August 2007 the company began producing the syringes at a “dramatic rate” and that was when quality began to slip.

The FDA was notified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention about the adverse events reported, and within five days the FDA had closed down the plant for manufacturing violations. The FDA also contends that “evidence of a casual link between the AM2PAT product” and the infections was “never conclusively established.”

The FDA’s claims don’t sit well with Martin, who says he will pursue legal action.

Source: WRAL

SOURCE: Heparin Recall › Father blames FDA for not taking precautions to protect son

Last March, after more than 100 people died and hundreds more were sickened after being given the tainted heparin, an investigation found that heparin manufactured in Baxter’s China plant had been contaminated with oversulfated chondroitin sulfate (OSCS). OSCS mimics heparin and can cost substantially less to produce – $9 compared to $900. However, OSCS can cause serious allergic reactions which can lead to death.

The lawsuit states, “The recalled heparin was adulterated, misbranded, defective, unreasonably dangerous and unfit for its intended uses. Baxter placed tens of thousands of patients, including the Plaintiffs, at unnecessary risk of serious injury and/or death.”

It also claims Baxter wrongfully allowed the heparin to be placed on the market and “breached its express warranties that heparin had no dangerous side effects and that its ingredients were manufactured in a plant in accordance with FDA regulations,” according to the report.

The six-count suit seeks a judgment of more than $300,000 plus costs and other relief.

SOURCE: Heparin Recall › Class action lawsuit filed against Baxter over tainted heparin scandal

American Capital purchased 87 percent of Scientific Protein Laboratories in 2006. Scientific Protein Laboratories has a fair market value of $186.5 million. Last year, the parent company sought coverage from its insurers for lawsuits related to Scientific Protein Laboratories’ involvement in the tainted heparin scandal.

While Baxter International is at the center of the tainted heparin controversy, the Charter Oak Fire Insurance Co. and Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America argue that in its application for coverage, Scientific Protein Laboratories’ parent company American Capital claimed it had no subsidiaries and never mentioned Scientific Protein Laboratories or its China-based heparin venture, according to the report. In its lawsuit filed last week, the insurance companies claim that “American Capital provided false answers to Charter Oak and Travelers regarding the non-existence of subsidiaries.”

The lawsuit also claims that American Capital and Scientific Protein Laboratories entered into an agreement with Baxter International that included making payments to Baxter and giving “rights to insurance proceeds and benefits,” according to the report.

SOURCE: Heparin Recall › Heparin producer’s insurers file lawsuit

The Quaids also sued Baxter Healthcare Corp. over the packaging and labeling of its high-dose and low-dose heparins, arguing the two bottles are easily confused. Other cases of heparin overdose have been reported and linked in part to the confusing packaging. The Quaid’s lawsuit against Baxter was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds because the event occurred in California.

Baxter was no stranger to the spotlight in 2008, facing numerous lawsuits most notably for the tainted heparin scandal earlier in the year. More than 80 Americans died and hundreds more were sickened after receiving doses of heparin made at Baxter China plant. An investigation found that lots made in that plant were contaminated with over-sulfated chondroitin sulfate (OSCS). The contaminant can cause serious allergic reactions and even death. The FDA issued a recall on batches of Baxter’s heparin.

According to news reports, the Quaid-Cedars-Siani case indicates that Baxter may also sue Cedars-Siani for improperly administering the blood thinner to several patients at the hospital, including the Quaid’s newborn twins.

SOURCE: Heparin Recall › Quaid-Cedars-Siani lawsuit over heparin overdose finally closed

Joyce Ann Osteen filed the suit in St. Clair County, Illinois, and claims Baxer purposefully added a contaminant, over-sulfated chondroitin sulfate, or OSCS, to heparin manufactured in its China plant. The tainted heparin was distributed to the U.S., where hundreds of allergic reactions occurred. More than 80 people died and hundreds more were sickened by the tainted heparin before an investigation led to a recall of batches of heparin manufactured at Baxter’s China facility. The FDA later issued an announcement saying that the contaminant was an inexpensive and unapproved ingredient that mimics heparin.

OSCS costs only $9 to produce compared to $900 for heparin, the suit contends.

“The recalled heparin was adulterated, misbranded, defective, unreasonably dangerous and unfit for its intended uses,” the suit states. “Baxter placed tens of thousands of patients, including the Plaintiff at unnecessarily risk of serious injury and/or death.”

The suit states Osteen and the class members who purchased the heparin “suffered actual damages as a proximate result of Baxter Healthcare Corp.’s deception in that they were deprived of the benefit of their bargain.” According to the complaint, Osteen is asking the court to certify the complaint as class action. She also is seeking damages of less than $74,999 per plaintiff or class member.

SOURCE: Heparin Recall › Class action lawsuit filed against heparin manufacturer Baxter

Heparin is generally used when a patient – adult or infant – receives fluids through a central line to prevent a blood clot from forming, which could eventually grow and break off and kill a patient. But if the blood is too thin, it puts the patient at risk for life-threatning bleeding or hemorrhages, including in the brain.

The Quaids also sued Baxter Healthcare Corp. over the packaging and labeling of its high-dose and low-dose heparins, arguing the two bottles are easily confused. Other cases of heparin overdose have been reported and linked in part to the confusing packaging. The Quaid’s lawsuit against Baxter was dismissed, according the Associated Press.

Baxter International has faced numerous lawsuits lately, most notably for the tainted heparin scandal earlier this year. More than 80 Americans died and hundreds more were sickened after receiving doses of heparin made at Baxter International’s China plant. An investigation found that lots made in that plant were contaminated with over-sulfated chondroitin sulfate (OSCS). The contaminant can cause serious allergic reactions and even death. The FDA issued a recall on batches of Baxter’s International’s heparin.

The Associated Press reports that the petition filed Monday in the Quaid-Cedars-Sinai case indicates that Baxter International may also sue Cedars-Sinai for improperly administering the blood thinner to several patients at the hospital, including the Quaid’s newborn twins.

SOURCE: Heparin Recall › Quaids get settlement in heparin overdose case

Franke Leon Isom of Webster, Ken., died Dec. 14, 2007, a day after he was given heparin during treatment at Woodland Dialysis Clinic in Elizabethtown. Attorneys argue that Isom received part of the 55,000 gallons of heparin that was contaminated with over-sulfated chondroitin sulfate (OSCS).

Earlier this year, a series of deaths and adverse allergic reactions from patients who had received doses of heparin led to an investigation that linked the reactions to lots of heparin made at Baxter International’s China plant. Further review found the heparin had been contaminated with OSCS during manufacturing in China. Shortly thereafter, the FDA ordered a recall. The tainted heparin is blamed for more than 240 deaths worldwide and caused hundreds more people to fall ill from allergic reactions to OSCS, such as hypotension.

The lawsuit, filed on the behalf of Isom’s estate, is one of 50 similar civil tort claims against Scientific Protein Laboratories and Baxter International, according to the news report. Attorneys argue that recalled lots of heparin were still found on hospital shelves months after the recall went into effect.

SOURCE: Heparin Recall › Another lawsuit filed in tainted heparin scandal

The report revealed that inspecting the more than 3,000 overseas drug plants would take the FDA more than 13 years to complete The agency fired back, saying “The conclusion that FDA should endeavor to conduct foreign inspections based on the same criteria as domestic inspections is…problematic because of the differences in regulatory methodology and resources,” according to the Associated Press.

The need for careful inspections of foreign drug manufacturing plants has come to the forefront since the tainted heparin scare earlier this year that killed more than 80 people and sickened hundreds more. Those batches of heparin were found to have been contaminated in Baxter International’s Chinese manufacturing plant.

Now the Natural News is reporting that the FDA is refusing to release information on which Chinese companies supplied the tainted heparin. According to Natural News, the FDA claims that a confidentially agreements with producers of heparin are preventing the government agency from revealing which Chinese companies supplied heparin ingredients to the United States. It also claims that because of the Memorandum of Agreement that regulates relationships between the FDA and China, the FDA does not have the legal authority to prevent Chinese-manufactured medicines from being imported into the U.S. The FDA says it relies on companies to voluntarily rest their own heparin ingredients, a process that obviously failed last year when contaminated heparin entered the United States.

Meanwhile, Chinese health officials say that it has not been proven that the heparin was contaminated in Chinese plants, and that contamination could just have easily happened in Baxter’s New Jersey plant.

SOURCE: Heparin Recall › FDA will not name Chinese plants that supplied tainted heparin

“With more drug companies buying ingredients and producing products overseas, country-of-origin labeling is more important than ever,” Sen. Brown said in a press release.

Country-of-origin labeling for active pharmaceutical ingredients was initially proposed last April as part of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Globalization Act. Sen. Brown’s proposal would require similar labeling for active ingredients as well as inactive ingredients on both prescription and over-the-counter medications.

The bill comes on the heels of the FDA recall of heparin last spring, which was found to have been contaminated at Baxter International’s China manufacturing plant. The contaminated heparin killed more than 80 people and sickened hundreds more.

The bill coincides with new provisions for country-of-origin labeling of food products. As of September 30, 2008, retailers must notify their customers of the country of origin of commodities outlined by the newly amended Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946.

With so many alarming recalls from China – from contaminated heparin and baby formula to toys laced with lead paint and generators plagued by fire hazard claims – knowing where our medications and food originate will help us all make more informed decisions whether to buy them.

SOURCE: Heparin Recall › Senator proposes country-of-origin labeling for medications

Last month I told you that California Rep. Harry Waxman, who serves as head of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, raised concerns that items outlined on the FDA’s 2007 priorities list appeared to prioritize industry desires over consumer protection.

This, just months after more than 80 American deaths were linked to tainted heparin that was made in Baxter International Inc.’s facility in China. FDA officials later acknowledged they had not inspected that facility and claimed they had insufficient staff and financial resources to regularly inspect overseas manufacturers.

Today, the Washington Post reported that the FDA has hired a public relations company it improve its image. However, in yet another PR blunder, the story reports that the way it hired the company may also be raising eyebrows.

The story suggests that the FDA may have violated government contracting rules by not holding a bidding competition for a $300,000 contract hiring a firm to create “a lasting positive public image for the agency.” Instead it made a deal with Alaska Newspapers Inc., (ANI) which is exempt from having to compete for federal work because it qualifies for special set-asides. ANI agreed to funnel all the work to the FDA’s agency of choice, Qorvis Communications. Apparently the FDA’s new PR head, Mildred Cooper, had connections to the firm and wanted to use it.

The FDA cancelled its contract with ANI/Qorvis Communications after the Washington Post’s story ran. And while the FDA claims it never meant to do anything questionable during the selection process, this latest blunder certainly hasn’t helped the organization’s public image.

SOURCE: Heparin Recall › FDA makes blunder during hiring of PR firm to improve image

Alchemia’s CEO, Dr Peter Smith said “The impending commercialization of generic fondaparinux and anticipated revenues in calendar year 2009 will form a strong financial base for Alchemia. This will enable the company to advance its drug targeting and drug discovery technologies to further build a sustainable pipeline of opportunities for future commercialization.”

The company’s report states: “Given the complexity of the synthesis, Alchemia continues to believe that its generic fondaparinux will be the only generic brought to market, restricting competition to two drugs, Alchemia’s fondaparinux and GSK’s Arixtra. Typically, a first generic will take 40-50 percent of the prescription share, and with Alchemia’s fondaparinux expected to be the sole generic, a modest level of price discounting is anticipated.”

Arixtra is the only heparin drug not derived from biological sources as it is a synthetic molecule. Thus, it was not among the recent heparin recall.

Alchemia contends that there are no significant technical hurdles remaining and that generic fondaparinux approval and launch is expected in the first half of 2009, depending on review time at the FDA.

SOURCE: Heparin Recall › Synthetic heparin expected to launch early 2009